Congregation Beth El Sanctuary

onion

When an architect first chooses a concept on which to base his or her design, the difficult process of designing and building is just beginning. If the established concept was made with a thorough understanding of the needs of the users, the available resources, and existing constraints, then the resulting project will likely be deemed successful. However, if the concept is established without the understanding and respect of these characteristics and pursued to the nth degree solely for the satisfaction of the architect's ego, then chaos ensues. Such is the result of the sanctuary building and other site improvements recently completed at Congregation Beth El in La Jolla.

In the case of this building, Stanley Saitowitz and his designers created a building that is dangerous to its users, creates an extreme amount of discomfort during religious services, and ignores the basic operational needs of building maintenance. The use of materials consistently clashes - acid-washed precast with plastic light switch cover plates, dark hardwood floors abutting WalMart storefront systems, and long expanses of highly finished drywall with light washing across the surfaces showing each and every imperfection.

Modular pavers used in the courtyard (where there modularity is not only ignored but blatantly disrespected) continue into the interior space, where the porosity, joints, and texture make the floor impossible to sweep or clean. Large expanses of single pane glass are etched with scripture and meant to be viewed and read from the outside, but the varying materials, configurations, and light levels and reflections leave the observer struggling to make sense of what exactly is portrayed. Enormous concrete panels are assembled in a way that creates unsightly, uneven, and dissimilar joints as much as 2" wide, all filled with sealant with the care and craftsmanship of an apprentice.

The designer responsible for the site work details spent little time observing the behavior of the users of the site, be they congregants of Beth El or those of a neighboring synagogue who use the property as a path of travel between two parallel streets. Massive stairways are built to the bare minimum standards and are steep, intimidating, and harshly lit at night. The handrail sections have sharp edges and no breaks to allow for users to pass from one side to the other if they choose. For those who cannot use stairs or are pushing strollers, a complete lack of curb cuts between the entry at the bottom of the property to the highest entry point (more than 100 feet in elevation change) must stay in the drives and deal with narrow alleys that only permit two cars traveling opposite directions to pass, with no space left for the pedestrian. Lamp posts placed directly in the middle of sidewalks reduce their effective width such that strollers, wheelchairs, walkers, users of crutches and anyone using a hand cart must divert into the landscaping in order to pass.

On the inside, the symmetry of the seating works against the multiple types of services that are typically conducted within this type of space. With the seats arranged in parallel with facing rows, in all but a few seats the congregants must turn their head for extended periods of time to watch the activity. The rows are spaced such that no one can pass someone who is seated - everyone must stand up. The vertical panels with sharp edges and corners are the cause of constant bruises to the thighs or other more painful parts of the anatomy, and the closed-end rows make egress difficult and lengthy, and often leave multiple seats unused because people simply don't want to deal with the trouble of getting to them. The multiple elevations changes within the space create trip and fall hazards with nearly each event. The seating at the second level is built with stair so steep that most people turn away once they look down from the top level, the designated and only approachable path of travel. The glass panels at the 2nd level completely eliminate any modesty from anyone wearing skirts shorter than ankle length. The same effect occurs from the top looking down onto the first few rows of seats.

Project Information
Project Address: 
8660 Gilman Drive
Project Owner/ Developer: 
Congregation Beth El
Owner Contact Name/ Email: 
Eric Levine/eric@congregationbethel.org
Project Architect/ Designer: 
Stanley Saitowitz
Image
CBE1.jpg
BethEl 06.jpg
BethEl 07.jpg
BethEl 10.jpg
BethEl 11.jpg
BethEl 12.jpg

Comments:

Interior Gone Bad

The exterior had a bit of promise at first glance, but the interiors almost put it in the onion category. The color palette is jarring and dark and looks more suited for a bowling alley. And other than the identifying Star of David at the exterior this could easily be just another suburban medical or office building.

an Orchid please.

Perhaps because I was not historicaly involved with the building, its design or the related committees who stewarded its creation I saw the Stone Family Building at Congregation Beth El in La Jolla from a very different point of view. I found it one of the better “spiritual” designs I have seen in many years. It renewed a memory of looking at the pictures of synagogues from the revolutionary war period, in colonial days. There the houses of worship seemed rather plain, quiet, not testaments of wealth or grandeur as typified by cathedrals. The sanctuaries, with the congregants facing the pulpit on three different sides both on the ground level and in balconies, had a sense of intimacy. I could sense in a visual manner what Buber means when he explains the relationship between man and G-D as I, thou. Later in life as I traveled throughout the world I would go to Churches, Cathedrals, and Synagogues many having been built centuries ago. What seemed most comfortable to me were those that continued to reached for that moment of personal connection like those houses of prayer in New England. The new Stone Sanctuary at Congregation Beth El in La Jolla has many of those visual qualities that convey that sense of one’s individual involvement with worship. The building itself like it’s older sister across the lot does not quickly say house of worship, church, Synagogues, Mosque or other religious structure. It is a basic building with clear glass columns that suggest great light inside. Surprisingly, even with the Hebrew sketched on the glass it was only at the door when I look up is it apparent from the awning made to resemble a Jewish star, did I clearly understand this was a synagogue. Entering, it clearly was a synagogue with the ark on one side but with the pulpit in the center surrounded by rich rows of seats and balconies that allowed for those sitting at the farthest points a clear, connected view of the Rabbi pulpit. Proximity to the center does not seem to be reserved for those who came the earliest or earned a special privilege. I am drawn to the high use of woods as a symbol of both natural richness and simplicity. It is a material that will change through time leaving continued memories. The opaque glass that encased the balcony seemed a warm transition from the old- wood-to the new- glass. I was not quite sure how to interpret the dark ceiling but it doesn’t detract from the focus on the pulpit. I am drawn to the building as much because it does not set itself as the center of my world (The Disney Concert hall as much as I admire the structure is all about the the Disney Concert Hall) but as a place where I can find refuge and solace and connection with my community, with my religion, with self. If that does not deserve and orchid; what does? LewKLEIN San Diego

A very disappointing nomination

As the Immediate Past President of Congregation Beth El and someone who has been intimately invovled in this project for the past decade, I cannot begin to express my disappointment over the letter that was submitted nominating this magnificent new project for an "Onion". It is especially disheartening knowing that it was written by an individual who cannot get over his personal animus over the fact that he was asked to resign from the Building Committee as a result of his inability to work cooperatively with the many other highly-respected professionals, accomplished business people, and committed volunteers involved in this massive project. His unwillingness to listen, compromise, or cooperate left the leadership of this otherwise harmonious group no choice but to take the difficult step of asking this (and only this) one individual to remove himself from involvement. Now that the project has been completed and the hundreds of families who generously contributed to its completion are thoroughly enjoying and appreciating it, he has submitted this mean-spirited and spiteful letter of nomination for your "Onion" award as merly his last means of attacking the people who put their hearts, money, and unselfish hard work into making their shared dream a reality. His letter is nothing more than his single-handed attempt to hurt the people who shunned his involvement and should be given no credence in an objective evaluation of this project. Since its dedication in May of this year, Congregation Beth El's campus has been toured by people from across the country (and some from across the globe), including highly-respectd architects and designers, religious and civic leaders, and thousands of visitors. They have unanimously praised this new building, both for its design as well as for its functionality. The sanctuary is considered a unique, inspiring, and moving sacred space. The grounds of the campus are considred be not only peaceful and inviting but accessible to all. The various items specified in the submission letter are so far from being accurate or honest that they do not warrant a response. However, they are easily proven false by a tour of the property. I can only ask that whomever reviews this submittal not let this one very sour apple spoil the whole barrel. I can only hope that this process is one of objectivity and professional consideration and not ruled by the ill motives and evil intentions of persons who are permitted to make initial submissions. Sincerely, Gary Ravet

ORCHID NOMINATION

My name is Ryan Stone and I am the Building Chairman for Congregation Beth El. I am responsible for the development of this project. It is extremely unfortunate that this groundbreaking project is nominated for an Onion and not an Orchid. It is also unfortunate that this project needs to be defended from a negative review as opposed to being understand as a new demonstration of intimate and spiritual design. The purpose of this design was to redefine the idea Jewish sanctuary architecture. We started with the idea of creating a space that would invoke a feeling of community, intimacy and spirituality. My committee went through an extensive research into the history of sanctuary architecture in order to find inspiration for these design goals. Our research led us to the magnificent sanctuaries of Eastern Europe that were either destroyed or abandoned during the Nazi Holocaust. In formulating our design, Stanley Saitowitz, the design architect, fused elements from these sanctuaries that augmented a sense of spirituality, intimacy and community with modern architectural themes. In result, the fusion of the old and the new created a unique contrasting design. The outside feels like it belongs in 21st century San Diego; strong and modern. Yet, the inside creates a feeling of the old Jewish world that no longer exists. It's interior architectural elements augment intimacy and community through the balconies and the face to face parliamentary seating which force eye contact and wrap around the religious activities in the center of the space. Further, the clean, minimalistic interior design enhance ones spiritual focus by creating a sense of calm and Zen-like feeling. The judgment of the success of this design should not be based on this negative review but on the most important aspect of architecture; the positive emotions invoked from the user. In that, I feel strongly that this design is an extraordinary success and that the majority of people who tour and pray in this space will agree. There is so much more to this design than I have written. I invite any reader of this post or potential juror to email me at rstone@monarchgroup.com for a further discussion of all elements of this design and the reasons behind any design decision. Ryan Stone

new light

These photos sure shed a new light on this project. It's actually quite lovely! Thanks for posting them. We (the People) can now cast a better informed vote!

Congregation Beth El

This is one of the most elegant and sophisticated buildings that I have seen in San Diego. I just can't imagine that the jury would chose to award it an Onion!

More Photos/Examples please...

I concur with a few comments below I don’t think this building even comes close to onion status. I was actually able to find additional photos of Congregation Beth El Sanctuary on Stanley Saitowitz / Natoma Architects’ website www.saitowitz.com Most of the writer’s criticism seems very detail oriented. Being one of the longest review on Orchids and Onions, I think the writer of this review either needs to post more photos to back up his or her points because without visiting the site or seeing additional images it is impossible to see how any of the issues raised by the writer is relevant to the “architecture” or how the project fails to “understand the needs of the users, the available resources, and existing constrains…”. For example what is meant by “a building that is dangerous to its users”? Aren’t there building codes that regulate what is dangerous and what is not? Also, if the drywalls in the space are “highly finished” how does it show imperfections?(examples please) If there is more than 100 feet in elevation change on the site how have the users been using the site as a path of travel between two parallel streets without the stairs? Looking at some of the interior shots of Beth El on the Saitowitz website it looks like the seating faces a center podium… much like a parliament style seating. I am not familiar with the types of services that are conducted in this space but curious to know why this parliament seating model does not work. I am sure when writing an “Onion” review a writer is pressured to highlight as many negative points of the project one can come up with but I think comments like: how the pavers “makes the floor impossible to clean”, how vertical panels cause “bruises to the thighs or other more painful parts of the anatomy” or how glass guardrails do not provide “anyone wearing skirts shorter than ankle length” really helps your argument regarding the architectural review of the project in question… I think it would be good to really think about what it is that you are trying to communicate to the readers in your reviews perhaps with more references to photos/examples...

I Disagree!!

I disagree with the legthy desciption above. Instead, I am surprised how intimate and comfortable one feels inside for such a dramatic space . All the seats are close to center, and you can really participate in the service. The Torah is clearly visible when being read. The building is beautiful and uplifting on the outside and protected and intimate within.